Active Shooter Defence

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
active shooter defence

Active shooter defence is frightening, and often incredibly risky. There are few situations more dangerous.


It is a sad fact that we are vulnerable to violence unless we remain vigilant, are skilled at self defence, and have a good helping of luck on our side. Bad people want something we have: our resources, such as money and valuables, or our life, and want to stop that from happening.
This knowledge is perhaps one of the biggest reasons for anyone to start doing Krav Maga.


We train our body to become stronger and familiar with movements, and we train our mind to function under stress and make the right decisions. We do this in a dynamic environment against an empty-handed or armed assailant, with returning attackers, multiple attackers, in the dark, in a crowd, getting to safety, etc.

Perhaps one of the most challenging dynamic environments would be an “individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area”, or Active Shooter, as defined by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Sadly, the phenomenon of an active shooter is a growing concern, not just for elementary schools or social service facilities in the United States, but also for shopping malls in Kenya, museums and Airports in Belgium, and café’s and concert halls like we saw in Paris in November 2015.

Yes, some of these examples are terrorism. However, if we look at the act itself, it is also an active shooter incident, regardless of the political stance and the perpetrator(s) goals.

For the most part, we live in a society where our safety and security is in the hands of our men and women in law enforcement and our security services. Law enforcement officers receive the distress call, and they run towards the threat and deal with the problem. However, an important discrepancy needs to be talked about., and there is an elephant in the room; it is called time.

Because active shooter situations are often over within 10 to 15 minutes, before law enforcement arrives on the scene, individuals must be prepared both mentally and physically to deal with an active shooter situation.” Department of Homeland Security

In other words, the 10 to 15 minutes from an incident start to it is finished.

You are alone in a hostile situation where seconds matter. What do you do?

On April 16, 2007, a 23-year-old student at Virginia Tech, Seung-Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people, shot and wounded 17 others (6 more were injured as they tried to escape from the gunman), before he killed himself. Cho first killed two students in one part of the campus, then he went home, to the post office and then to another part of the campus to continue his killing spree. Cho then entered the Norris Hall building, barricading the doors and walked up and down the corridor of a floor to observe which were used and not.

Room 204 – had a class of 19 people, 2 killed, 0 injured (Barricaded door, most ran away through a window)

Room 205 – had a class of 12 people, 0 killed, 0 injured (Barricaded door)

Room 206 – had a class of 14 people, 10 killed, 2 injured (Stayed in room)

Room 207 – had a class of 13 people, 5 killed, 6 injured (barricaded the door after the first attack)

Room 211 – had a class of 19 people, 12 killed, 6 injured (Stayed in the room, tried to barricade)

The police was notified only two-three minutes after the first shots were fired, and since they were already on campus, they arrived at the scene relatively quick. However, Cho had barricaded the doors and put up signs that said the doors were booby-trapped. The police made their entry to the premises and saw Cho in the hallway. Cho ran into room 211 and shot himself in the head. The incident was over in less than 12 minutes, with five faculty members and 27 students dead, and 17 injured.

Do something!

What we see from this single incident is that those who barricaded themselves and were prepared, and those who ran away, had a much higher likelihood of surviving an active shooter incident than those who did nothing. This is an important indicator for those who should find themselves in a situation like this. Staying passive and waiting for an attack to come to you defies everything KMG stands for.

The first rule of self-defence is NOT TO BE THERE WHENIT HAPPENS.

This may sound trivial but think about it. If you hear gunshots or explosions at a time and place where this is out of place, you should use the “sneakers-defense” and run away. If you cannot run away, you should look for cover, not just concealment, to shield yourself from the incident. Barricading a door, as we have seen above makes sense. Indeed, due to incidents like Virginia Tech, the FBI and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in the United States have implemented a simple, yet effective acronym

Run, Hide, Fight!

The acronym suggests three avenues:

  1. If a safe escape route is available to you, run to a safe place. Help others to get out!
  2. If it is not possible to get out safely, or you are not sure it is safe, find a place to hide. Lock the door, barricade it and silence your cell phone. Know where you are and convey this to the emergency operators so they can pinpoint your location.
  3. If there is no other option(!), fight the attacker aggressively, using whatever weapons are available (for example, a pen, fire extinguisher, chair, a table, or hot coffee).

For the purpose of this blog post, the last point, fight the attacker aggressively, in essence doing Krav Maga, makes absolute sense. However, as with any decision to attack while in a bad situation, you have to weigh your options and explore the avenues that will reduce your risk (or of those you love and/or are responsible for) of being seriously injured or killed.

Although some acronyms suggest people attack an assailant as a group, it is important to note that it is not in our nature to band together and then charge an attacker, entering our “space.”

Krav Maga teaches us self-defense and how to protect ourselves and those we care for.

A couple of weeks ago, Eyal Yanilov came to our club in Norway as part of our Instructor Update (IU), where the topic of the weekend was “active shooter”. Eyal brought us through several techniques and tactics over the course of three days, where the focus was partly self-defense and partly how to attack an attacker.

The weekend also contained theoretical aspects of the “run, hide, fight” concept, presented by me, as a background to the theme of the weekend. We felt that this was an important aspect of our training and also important knowledge to pass on to our students.

In essence, the techniques which Eyal presented, directed the trainees to attack the active shooter in different ways, approaching from different directions and ranges, using various strikes and kicks, how to control different types of weapons in an assailant’s hands, as well as tackles and throwing/takedowns techniques.

The knowledge and techniques given to us by Eyal came from incidents including hostage taking, which at a later stage turned into the shooting of those victims, in Israel in the early 1970’s, as well as later incidents around the world.

For more reading material, I you may want to read this blog post: “what to do in an active shooter incident” by Brett and Kate McKay, and look at this infographic made by Rachel in her blog post “How to Protect Your Children in an Active Shooter Situation”.

For a more academic approach to active shooter, you might want to read these papers:

Dusek, Denise. 2013. “An Ideal Model for Responding to Active Shooter Incidents in Schools”. Link:

Zacarese, Lawrence M. 2015. “Run, hide, fight … re-evaluate?” Link:

About the Author

Freddy is an E1, KMG instructor in Norway, and part of the national team of instructors. Freddy has an MA in counter-terrorism from the University of St Andrews, MA in “Intelligence & International Security” from King’s College London, and worked in threat analysis and close protection for many years.